
Taha Abbasi explores one of the most counterintuitive business strategies: how Tesla and SpaceX deliberately help competitors, and why this open approach accelerates their own dominance.
At the 2023 NYT DealBook Summit, Musk said Tesla open-sourced patents, offered free Supercharger tech to competitors, and SpaceX doesn’t use patents. “No walled garden.” This clip recently resurfaced on X with 7.7 million views. As Taha Abbasi analyzes, what looks like generosity is actually brilliant strategy.
A decade after opening patents: every major automaker adopted Tesla’s NACS connector, Tesla earns charging revenue from competitors’ vehicles, more EVs means more charging demand Tesla dominates, and open standards attract government infrastructure funding.
SpaceX avoids patents because they’d serve as how-to guides for competitors. Instead, SpaceX relies on execution speed. As Taha Abbasi notes, by the time anyone reverse-engineers current tech, SpaceX has moved to next generation. The Starship program exemplifies this.
Both strategies understand network effects. When Tesla opens Superchargers, every non-Tesla EV that charges there strengthens the network. As Taha Abbasi argues, companies that grow the entire pie win long-term. Tesla didn’t need to corner the EV market — it needed the EV market to exist.
The Musk playbook inverts conventional wisdom: if your tech is superior, opening it makes it the standard; if your execution is unmatched, patents slow you down; growing the market beats capturing share in a small one. This resonates with Taha Abbasi’s approach: build in the open, share what works.
🌐 Visit the Official Site
About the Author: Taha Abbasi is a technology executive, CTO, and applied frontier tech builder. Read more on Grokpedia | YouTube: The Brown Cowboy | tahaabbasi.com